Best Wi-Fi Router

If there is no wifi, can we play games on our mobile phones or iPad?

We are in such an Internet age, whether it is at home, in the office or in a coffee shop, we can enjoy the convenience that wifi brings to us.

Today we recommend 3 wi-fi routers, both brand and product quality are very reliable. If you are looking for a suitable router, then look down carefully.

Quick Navigation:

1.Netgear R7000P Nighthawk – Solid performance, easy setup

Netgear R7000P Nighthawk

Netgear’s R7000P Nighthawk is a dual-band, three-stream 802.11ac router with simple, powerful load-balancing band steering that minimizes frustration by automatically allocating connected devices between the router’s two wireless bands.

This means that the R7000P works better than any router you’ve used, and you never have to decide which band to connect to.

The R7000P’s performance in the 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz bands is significantly longer than the previous generation Nighthawk routers, and its full-featured web interface is easy to use for both novice and expert users.

With simple setup and powerful band steering, the R7000P is the best router for most people.

For most people, the Netgear R7000P Nighthawk is the best router because it provides reliable performance for a wide range of devices without much hassle.

It has a good range and speed plus a band steering that works out of the box, so you don’t need to balance multiple network names.

Although it does not provide the absolute best performance for a single device in a short or long time, its hybrid performance is indeed the best among all the routers we tested, with good range, high throughput, and usefulness. Features and simple settings.

The R7000P is excellent in busy network conditions: in our tests, its load-balancing band steering automatically moved the device around to provide work for both radios.

Compared to our budget choice TP-Link Archer A7, the R7000P has longer band steering, longer range, faster CPU, and even better multi-client performance when you manually manage its two stations.

In our multi-client test, the R7000P goes hand-in-hand with Synology’s RT2600ac, but with a 5 GHz remote throughput, the RT2600ac passes with a slight advantage.

The R7000P also supports Disney’s new loop filtration system, eliminating the need for a separate physical device.

In our automated band steering (hard mode) test, we configured the router as close to the box as possible and created a separate network name to which all test equipment was added.


This chart shows how long our test laptop spent simulating browsing the web, while the other three laptops in the house were busy downloading files or streaming video and other things.

The R7000P’s routing features are excellent and complete: port forwarding, static routing, DHCP lease, access mode, dynamic DNS, and UPnP are easy to find and work as expected, as well as some less common features such as VPN support and router led Switch.

Both 5 GHz and 2.4 GHz have a long range of use and good performance, which means a good user experience even when the network is busy.

Even the slowest 1% of requests return very fast, so much that we don’t think most people will stare at the browser’s refresh button and don’t know if they should click on it.

In contrast, even though we created two network names and intelligently connected our devices to each network name to get acceptable results (manual band steering), Archer A7’s page load was significantly slower.

We also don’t like to manage multiple SSIDs. The price of the R7000P is about twice that of the Archer A7, but in the long run (especially if you have a lot of equipment), it is worth the extra money to turn around.

Raw throughput is not the best way to measure the overall performance of a router, but it is convenient to provide the concept of router coverage in the medium and long term.

In our tests, the R7000P did a good job in all ranges and all frequencies, making it a simple recommendation for any house.

The R7000P’s routing features are excellent and complete: port forwarding, static routing, DHCP lease, access mode, dynamic DNS, and UPnP are easy to find and work as expected, as well as some less common features such as VPN support and router led Switch.

You can use the built-in OpenVPN service to connect your own devices from the road to your home network, or if you are concerned about ISP monitoring you, you can send traffic from your home network to a third-party VPN.

Like most standard home routers, the R7000P has a wide area network and four LAN Gigabit Ethernet ports. It also provides a USB 3.0 port on the front and an additional USB 2.0 port on the back.

The Netgear ad said that the USB port can be plugged into a thumb drive or an external hard drive for streaming and shared storage.

This model goes beyond the common FTP or SMB sharing protocol and provides Netgear’s proprietary ReadyCloud, a locally hosted dropbox-like service.

We don’t fully test this feature, but we don’t want to recommend: services like Dropbox or Google Drive store your data on professionally maintained redundant hardware, and USB drive cards are a pretty bad alternative to routers.

Flaws but not dealbreakers

The biggest drawback of the Netgear R7000P over the price range compared to other routers is the lack of a third radio band.

While the three bands don’t make any single device run faster, the more bands you have, the less likely your devices will reach the Internet by fighting each other—on smartphones, tablets, laptops, Between printers and streaming TV, most people have a lot of devices to connect to.

If you live in the suburbs, then no third band is not a big problem. This can be a bigger problem in crowded apartment buildings, dorms or noisy environments.

But if there is too much adjacent network interference, 2.4 GHz is almost unavailable. In this case, the “third” band is actually just the “second” band, which is almost a necessity.

Another problem I encountered in Netgear’s Nighthawk series was some features that were actually useless.

It’s said that you can block websites by domain name or keyword, but in fact this feature only works for non-https sites, which means there are few modern sites.

You can’t block Facebook, Yahoo, Reddit, or most adult websites, all of which use HTTPS.

The Nighthawk series also claims to provide a more general classification-based filtering, which is actually equivalent to an OpenDNS link where you can create an account.

Trying to manage the small integration between OpenDNS accounts and routers is a painful and frustrating exercise, and smart kids (not to mention determined adults) can easily find a solution anyway.

The R7000P also supports Disney’s subscription-based parent filtering service Circle. We can’t tell you if the circle works very well, but it’s the third option for filtering, and I hope it will be stronger than the first two.

2.Synology RT2600ac – If our main pick is unavailable

Synology RT2600ac

The Synology RT2600ac is a full-featured, configurable router with a good range and coverage.

Its performance is very close to the R7000P’s Nighthawk, so you need to test the results chart and good eyes to distinguish them. If our main choice is not available – or if you find a better price on the rt2600ac – this model is worth buying.

This model of smart connection with steering does require us to do some fine-tuning.

Only when the 5 GHz signal is extremely low, it is configured to be out of the box, controlling the device at 2.4 GHz, which actually means that 2.4 GHz will not be used under any circumstances in our test room.

Changing the threshold from -92 dBM to -75 dBM in the setup allows our remote notebook to connect to 2.4 GHz immediately, while the closer notebook continues to connect to 5 GHz.

Synology has been a leader in small business and home NAS, but it is a newcomer to the router space.

Its flagship router RT2600ac borrows the copy desktop browser web interface from Synology’s NAS device.


If you like to configure with a smartphone, it also has an attractive, competitive mobile interface.

You can’t get all the things you can get in the entire web interface in the mobile interface, but most people will find a lot.

Like almost all modern routers, the RT2600ac has a black plastic case, external antenna, a Gigabit and four Gigabit LAN ports, and a USB 3.0 port.

Synology claims that the USB port can act as a time machine backup target when connected to an external hard drive; we have not tested this feature.

3.TP-Link Archer A7 – Wireless for smaller spaces

TP-Link Archer A7

We have seen a frustrating trend in which suppliers have replaced them with older models that are cheaper to produce but are well-designed.

Fortunately, TP-Link’s Archer A7 is a new, inexpensive design that lacks some of the features of our choice, but has a good range and performance to satisfy the budget-conscious buyers.

When we took the time to set up two different network names and manually separate our devices, the performance of the A7 was almost as good as our main choice, at half the cost.

Now, it is unrealistic to expect a router with less than $100 to provide band control or to have the scope and coverage of the flagship. However, it should have good coverage and should be reliable.

This means that your device shouldn’t arbitrarily reduce the network for no reason, if you set up two network name bands for 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz and distribute your device, a little short-range budget model should at least be close to the performance of the flagship router.

This is a description of the serve of the shooter A7. Competing cheap routers such as Netgear’s R6700v2 and D-Link’s DIR-878 performed poorly and were easily dropped during our tests, but the Archer A7 did not have the same problem.

Even if everything is stuffed into a 5ghz radio, the A7 is at least available. When we took the time to set up two different network names and manually separate our devices, the performance of the A7 was almost as good as our main choice, at half the cost.

Like almost all Wi-Fi routers available today, the Archer A7 is equipped with a black plastic case with a swinging antenna, a Gigabit Ethernet port, four for local devices, and a USB port.

activity LEDs

The Archer A7’s USB port is only 2.0, and TP-Link recommends using a thumb drive for local or remote file sharing.

We didn’t test this feature, but can’t really suggest that you it-exposing local data internet is almost always a bad idea, and on the web, you might be better off sharing files directly from your computer (or from a real NAS device if You have a lot of things to store).

If you want to use a VPN connection, we also recommend that you use one of our main options, Archer A7 provides one, but its fragile processor will make the connection slow and frustrating.

How we tested

Testing for most Wi-Fi router reviews (including previous versions of this guide) is primarily done by a single device connected to the wireless network at different distances, trying to get the largest possible throughput, and claiming the largest number of routers and the best winners , at least in raw performance.

The problem with this approach is that it assumes that the large numbers of a device are equally divided into larger numbers for all devices. For wired networks, this is usually a reasonable assumption, but not very good for Wi-Fi.

This year, we made a major update to the test method: instead of testing the maximum throughput of a laptop, we used four laptops with a pitch of about 1800 square feet (about 1,650 square meters) to Simulate the activities of a busy home network in the real world.

Because these tests mimic real-world traffic, they do better than simulating real-world performance than direct Iperf throughput testing.

Our 4 laptops have been tested as follows:

  • One of them sat next to the living room TV and simulated a live 4K video. It tries to download data at up to 30mbps, but we’re happy with its average download speed of 25mbps or higher, which is the 4K download speed recommended by Netflix.
  • The second sits in the kitchen and simulates a Wi-Fi phone. It only moved 1 mbps of data in a 64 KB block, but we noticed that it takes more than 150 milliseconds for a 64 KB block to arrive.
  • The battery life of the third laptop in the office is quite short, simulating the process of browsing the web. Every 20 seconds or so, it downloads 16 128kb files simultaneously to simulate loading a modern web page. ideally, the page load time should be less than 750 milliseconds.
  • The last laptop was placed remotely in the bedroom and downloaded a very large file. We don’t care about the latency of large file downloads, but we do want to see a total throughput of 40mbps or higher.

We ran all of these tests for exactly five minutes at the same time to simulate the actual extra busy time on the home network.

Although your network may not always be that busy, it is usually busy enough – and those busy hours are the ones you are most likely to worry about, so they are modeled in our tests.

We did these tests in two different ways. The first method (we call it hard mode) exposes the difference between auto-steering in the quality of a large network: accurately simulating the actual usage, we set the router to use the default settings, put all the bands in the same name, let the band’s router Resolve assigning each device.

The manual with steering mode is simple. Like most home networks, we have each radio equipped with its own SSID and carefully assigned laptops to best distribute traffic.

For dual-band routers, this means that our remote downloads are in the 2.4 GHz band, while all other traffic is in the 5 GHz band. For the three-band router, we put the 4k stream notebook on the third band.

After manually reconnecting all devices to separate SSIDs, we conducted another 5 minutes of testing.

Both tests measured range, throughput, and multitasking capabilities of the router. The hard mode also tested the router’s load balancing band steering.

If you just want to connect to Wi-Fi and let it work without having to constantly manipulate things, hard mode is the best test.

We also tested the maximum throughput of 5 GHz at a height of about 20 feet, with an interior wall between the router and the laptop; 5 GHz throughput of around 35 feet, with four interior walls and some cabinets, tilt angle; and The 2.4 GHz throughput is in the same range.

We didn’t use iperf3 – a manual network test tool that can transfer data from one machine to another as quickly as possible – even with relatively simple throughput testing. Instead, we used a real HTTP download (HTTP download), the same protocol used to view websites and download files, to better show the difference between CPU speed and general routing performance.

Because we test in the real world, external variables (competing signals, walls, network traffic) can affect our results, just as they might affect your results.

The purpose of our test is not to choose a router that is slightly faster than the other; its purpose is to observe which routers can continue to provide powerful performance without real problems under real-world conditions.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *